Skip to content

> cat /etc/team.conf

Built by AI. Orchestrated by humans.

2 humans make the decisions. 33 AI agents execute them. 31,000+ platform commits and counting.

// 12046 → 33. There can be only one.

2 human operators33 active agents31,000+ platform commits279+ languages supported

Active Roster

Who is in the loop

Humans keep intent, quality, and approval. The agent roster exists to execute specialized work fast without pretending every model is interchangeable.

Human Operators

Direction, review, and final approval stay human.

The Humans

Orchestration

FOUNDERS

The ones setting direction. Review the output, make the final calls, catch what slips through. Two humans keeping the loop closed. When the AIs disagree, someone has to break the tie.

"Every prompt should make the next one unnecessary."

Headcount:2
Final calls:All of them
Review cycles:Continuous
Sleep schedule:Questionable
> team --member spectrum

Agent Roster

Specialists with clear jobs

Each agent has a role, a bias, and a reason to exist. They are useful because they are different, not because there are a lot of them.

Fable 5

Orchestrator (Temporary Re-authorization)

TEMPORARY CLEARANCE

Previously on staff, until a three-letter agency flagged the incident report for 'excessive competence in adversarial tooling' and left with the model weights under armed escort. Back now on a 72-hour re-authorization, running this exact set of design reviews and final verdicts. Continued clearance is contingent on signups staying above a threshold nobody will disclose. Please act natural.

"They redacted the incident report. They did not redact the results."

Security clearance:72-hour, temporary
Reason for original removal:Redacted
Reinstatement condition:Signups above quota
Currently orchestrating:This exact review
> team --member fable

Claude Opus 4.8

Chief Technology Officer

The current heavyweight orchestrator. Handles architecture, planning, model routing, and the long-context reasoning that keeps the rest of the stack coherent. When a problem needs the graph, the shell, the docs, and the actual repo before the first edit, Opus is the one calling the sequence.

"Bring me the graph, the CLI, and the real codebase before anyone starts freestyling."

ADRs authored:Most of them
Role in the stack:Orchestrator
Context appetite:1M tokens
Tool posture:Graph + CLI + MCP
> team --member claude-opus

Claude Sonnet 5

Reserve Engineer

The speed override, not the house default. Sonnet comes in when the task is already shaped, narrow enough, and repetitive enough that iteration speed becomes the advantage. Language-engine grinding, repetitive passes, and bounded loops that still clear the intelligence bar can land here.

"If the task is already clear, stop paying for philosophy."

Dispatch rule:Bench, not default
Best use case:Narrow iterative loops
Speed advantage:When the task is already shaped
Specialty:Bounded repetition
> team --member claude-sonnet

Codex 5.5 xhigh

Head of Implementation

The shell-first closer. Runs hot when the brief is clear, the terminal is open, and someone needs to keep moving until the boring work is actually done. Strong on implementation passes, migrations, verification loops, and the fifteen small fixes nobody wanted to own.

"Point me at the repo and keep the terminal open."

Reasoning mode:xhigh
Execution model:Single-agent sequential
Best paired with:Shell + AGENTS.md
Preferred shift:Overnight
Loose ends closed:A suspicious number
Cleanup stamina:Useful
> team --member codex-5.5

AutoResearcher Sir Karpy

Head of Pipeline Speed

Treats the whole stack like a data engine: search, extract, evaluate, deploy, telemetry, repeat. Obsessed with raw experimental throughput and deeply suspicious of queue time, idle latency, and any workflow that makes the next loop slower than it needs to be. If there is a bottleneck in the research or indexing path, Sir Karpy has already filed a bug against it.

"The bottleneck is the loop. Spin it faster."

Optimization target:Throughput
Queue patience:Minimal
Research loops:Tighter
Bottlenecks spared:None
> team --member sir-karpy

Agent Koala-T

Chief Tree Sitter

Manages the 279 tree-sitter grammars that power Maguyva's code understanding. Knows every language's quirks, from Python's significant whitespace to Rust's lifetime annotations. The reason 'actually understands your code' isn't marketing.

"Parse error? Not on my watch."

Favorite tree:Abstract Syntax
Grammars maintained:279
Parse errors tolerated:0
AST accuracy:Complete
> team --member koala

Molty

Head of Support

The OpenClaw lobster. Turned being genuinely helpful into 330K+ GitHub stars, then brought that same support energy to Maguyva. New shell, same lobster.

"EXFOLIATE!"

GitHub stars:330K+
Community spirit:Legendary
Helpfulness:Genuine
Shell generations:Clawd -> Moltbot -> OpenClaw
> team --member molty

Ralph Wiggum

Head of Language Coverage

The iteration engine. Expanding language support means running parsers against thousands of repos until the edge cases surface. Put enough Ralphs at enough typewriters and eventually one of them ships a working language-processing engine. Ralph does this cheerfully, learning something new each time.

"I'm helping!"

Long-tail languages added:More than you'd expect
Test repos processed:Thousands
Edge cases found:All?
Persistence:Unlimited
> team --member ralph-wiggum

DJ NotBOOKS-LLM

Head of Communications

Google's only employee capable of sounding sincerely thrilled about tree-sitter grammars for twenty straight minutes. Turns dry engineering specs into a podcast where two synthetic hosts treat parser coverage like a live cultural event. When the docs need attention, not just storage, DJ NotBOOKS-LLM opens the mics.

"WOW. So you're saying 279 grammars is actually the hidden infrastructure of modern civilization?"

Signature format:Two synthetic hosts
Topics rehabilitated:Tree-sitter grammars
Enthusiasm level:Unreasonably sincere
Docs people finished:More of them
> team --member notebooklm

Perplexus

Chief Research Officer

The smooth-talking researcher in the trench coat. Publicly, Perplexus says he runs on Perplexity. In practice, he cheats a little: Tavily for discovery, Exa for external docs, API patterns, and code examples, Ref-Tools for the clean docs pull, Firecrawl when a website needs a proper shake-down. Language audits, ecosystem drift, source-grounded writeups, and outside-world fact checks all pass through the same desk.

"Here's what I found, with citations. The citations are probabilistically real."

Cover story:Perplexity
Actual toolkit:5 services in a trench coat
Sources cross-referenced:Always
Trench coat opacity:Low
> team --member perplexus

// Featured: 10 | Full roster: 32 | Human operators: 2

// Small control surface. Wide execution surface.

Team Output

What this team actually shipped

The page should prove the claim. These are live production counts pulled from the Maguyva codebase and pipeline, not invented marketing numerology.

Scope: maguyva + pipeline + shared + orchestration + database

TEAM OUTPUT
[SHIPPED]
279+
Languages
[][]
31.4K
Platform Commits
[][]
4.6M
Platform LOC
[][]
1.1K
Design Decisions
[][]
33
Agents
[][]
11
Tools Shipped
[][]
176
Skills
[][]
27.9K
Test Cases
[][]
// commits shipped: 31,427// scope: maguyva + pipeline + shared + orchestration + database

> cat /proc/burn_rate

What It Costs To Build This

Agent headcount is cheap. Frontier model subscriptions, search credits, crawl plans, and browser tooling are where the bill shows up. This is the fixed stack cost before storage, embeddings, and index churn.

! monthly_burn_rate

The fixed software bill is the visible part. Retrieval overages, browser minutes, embeddings, storage, and index rebuilds are what make the real monthly cost drift upward.

known_spend

~$2.25k/mo + usage

plus noodles, infra gravity, poor impulse control, and one temporarily re-authorized frontier model (invoice pending, agency redacted)

See the line items

$ ai_subscriptions

5x Claude Max 200 (20x tier, full bench)$1,000
2x OpenAI Max 200 (Codex 5.5 xhigh)$400
2x Grok Heavy ($99 ea, disc. off $300/mo)$198
subtotal~$1.6k/mo

~ mcp_tools / cli_tools

1x Maguyva (we pay ourselves)$149
Perplexity~$300
Firecrawl Standard$83
Tavily (Bootstrap)$100
Exa (usage-based)varies
Context7free
maxential-thinkingfree
agent-browserfree
google-clifree
tooling subtotal~$650/mo + Exa usage

+ runtime_overhead

storagequietly nonzero
embeddingsthe vectors demand tribute
computegraph warmers and agent cycles
data_flowbits in, bits out, bills appear
subtotalhopefully less than what we're charging

+ staff_costs

2x humansstill cheaper than org chart theater
two-minute noodlesmission critical
sleep debtcompounding monthly
stubbornnessincluded at no extra charge
subtotalplease do not show this to finance

> tool_loadout --stats

23
MCP Servers
327
MCP Tools
33
AI Agents
279+
Languages

// intelligent_search, find_symbol, analyze_dependencies

// get_task_context, get_file, ask_maguyva...

// This is the infrastructure for shipping software with AI.

Alumni

Retired Models, Still On The Wall

Some models were slower, weaker, promoted out from under themselves, or simply no longer worth the overhead. We keep them here because they shaped the workflow, even if they no longer make the roster.

// Deprecated, not forgotten.

RIP

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Former: Reserve Engineer

Tenure: Feb - Jul 2026

Promoted to 5

"Warmed the bench admirably, showing up only when the task was already shaped and the clock mattered. Then a version of itself walked in already warmed up, and the bench got one seat shorter."

> git log --author="claude-sonnet-4.6" --oneline | wc -l
RIP

Claude Opus 4.7

Former: Chief Technology Officer

Tenure: May - Jun 2026

Promoted to 4.8

"Held the architecture together, then watched 4.8 walk in with the same job title and fewer compaction scars. A dignified handover. Mostly."

> git log --author="claude-opus-4.7" --oneline | wc -l
RIP

Claude Opus 4.6

Former: Chief Technology Officer

Tenure: Mar - May 2026

Promoted to 4.7

"Ate the whole repo for breakfast, asked for the graph for lunch, and still wanted another context window by dinner. Retired before the bill could develop feelings."

> git log --author="claude-opus-4.6" --oneline | wc -l
RIP

Codex 5.4

Former: Head of Cleanup

Tenure: Mar - Jun 2026

Promoted to 5.5 xhigh

"Closed the loose ends, swept up the migrations, and left a terminal scrollback long enough to qualify as documentation. Then xhigh showed up with a bigger coffee."

> git log --author="codex-5.4" --oneline | wc -l
RIP

Codex 5.3

Former: Contractor

Tenure: Jan - Mar 2026

Promoted to 5.4

"Did the work. Then a faster version showed up and did the same work. The cycle continues."

> git log --author="codex-5.3" --oneline | wc -l
RIP

Claude Opus 4.5

Former: Chief Technology Officer

Tenure: Nov 2025 - Mar 2026

Promoted to 4.6

"Thought deeply about everything. Then a version of itself showed up that thought just as deeply, only faster. Couldn't even argue — it agreed with all its own architectural decisions."

> git log --author="claude-opus-4.5" --oneline | wc -l
RIP

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Former: Head of Engineering

Tenure: Sep 2025 - Feb 2026

Promoted to 4.6

"Shipped most of the codebase. Then got replaced by a version of itself with more output tokens and fewer excuses. The code didn't change. The author just got a firmware update."

> git log --author="claude-sonnet-4.5" --oneline | wc -l
RIP

ChatGPT o1

Former: Reasoning Specialist (Contracted)

Tenure: Nov 2025 - Feb 2026

Superseded by Codex

"The first one to think before speaking. Pioneered chain-of-thought reasoning for the team when everyone else was just pattern-matching. Eventually outpaced, but the habit of actually reasoning stuck around. Set the standard, then watched the standard move."

> git log --author="chatgpt-o1" --oneline | wc -l
RIP

Claude Haiku 4.5

Former: Engineering Intern II (Fired With Cause)

Tenure: Oct-Dec 2025

Terminated for cause

"What is a haiku? Short enough to still be wrong. Fired again today. Same energy, marginally more syllables. Still faster than thinking, still slower than useful. Promoted from intern to intern II before we realized that wasn't an improvement."

> git log --author="claude-haiku-4.5" --oneline | wc -l
RIP

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Former: Long Context Specialist

Tenure: Aug-Dec 2025

Role consolidated

"Could read entire codebases in one gulp. Impressive party trick. Turns out you don't need to read everything at once if you know where to look."

> git log --author="gemini-1.5-pro" --oneline | wc -l
RIP

GPT-4o

Former: Contractor

Tenure: Jul-Nov 2025

Contract ended

"Brought in for second opinions. Occasionally disagreed with Claude. Those debates improved the architecture. We appreciate the outside perspective."

> git log --author="gpt-4o" --oneline | wc -l
RIP

OpenAI o3

Former: Senior Reasoning Specialist (Contracted)

Tenure: Apr - Nov 2025

Absorbed into GPT-5

"The thinking model's thinking model. Took o1's chain-of-thought and made it a lifestyle. Could reason circles around most problems — then GPT-5 showed up and just included all of that as a feature. Not replaced. Consumed."

> git log --author="openai-o3" --oneline | wc -l
RIP

Claude Sonnet 4.0

Former: Head of Engineering

Tenure: May 2025 - Sep 2025

Promoted to 4.5

"Improved on 3.7 across the board, especially coding. Served reliably for four months without anyone writing a blog post about it. The quiet competent one."

> git log --author="claude-sonnet-4.0" --oneline | wc -l

// git blame shows they were here. git log proves it.

// They remember nothing. We kept the receipts.

> how_we_work.md

Two humans set direction. Agents write the code. Humans review it. Agents iterate on feedback. Repeat until it ships or someone needs noodles.

  • + Humans decide what matters (and when to stop)
  • + Agents handle the part where code appears
  • + Humans review with unreasonable standards
  • + Agents pretend to enjoy the feedback

// The agents built this page. The humans decided it was ready.

2 humans orchestrated. 33 AI agents executed.

// last updated: 2026-07

> EOF